DJI, INTC, and QQQ each proved the framework works on a single benchmark, a single stock, and a single ETF. This piece asks a different question: does the same discipline hold up across an entire universe at once, US broad market indexes, US sector ETFs, international developed markets, and emerging markets, all tracked side by side, using the same rules, the same size, the same standard of verification.
Thirty-two major indexes and sector ETFs are currently tracked under this framework, spanning four categories: US broad market benchmarks, US sector ETFs, international developed markets, and emerging markets. Every entry, every staged profit-taking event, and every current position reflects real prices from real charts.
Several names, the UK’s FTSE 100, Japan’s Nikkei 225, and Canada’s TSX among them, reached a full three-stage SP-O sequence, the same 50% / 40% / 10% staged discipline already documented in the DJI, INTC, and QQQ records, now confirmed working the same way on entirely different exchanges, currencies, and market structures.
Separate from the performance record above, which reflects closed and open positions already in progress, this section reflects a single point-in-time snapshot of acuPHASE’s current reading across all thirty-two names. This is not a forecast, and it does not predict what will happen next. It is a factual account of where each market currently sits.
As of this snapshot, 20 of the 32 indexes and sector ETFs tracked are currently reading Warning, Distribution, or Bearish, not Bullish. This shift spans every category tracked, not one isolated corner of the market:
A similar structural setup, a strong, sustained bull market with real complacency building underneath it, preceded the 2007 to 2008 period. Reviewing the framework’s own historical output from that stretch shows a real, multi-month divergence between acuPHASE’s histogram and price itself: both DJI and the Utilities sector saw the histogram declining, making lower highs, for an extended period before the actual structural top confirmed. That divergence is a checkable, historical fact, not a claim about what today’s divergence means.
Whether today’s setup resolves the same way, resolves differently, or the current divergence closes and broader strength resumes, is not something this framework predicts. What it can show, with full transparency, is exactly how it navigated the last time market conditions looked structurally similar to this.
The complete chart-verified DJI accounts of how this framework navigated the 2002 to 2013 decade, three real losses included, is available in full on the Methodology page, alongside the complete INTC and QQQ records.
TRENDadvisor’s fully automated position and swing trading system software is designed to deliver high probability trades.